The Cold Start Problem That Kills Most Launches
Why having the best product means nothing without users
A client came to me with a sophisticated platform concept: connect researchers with investors, create curated communities around niche topics, and monetize the connections.
The technology was interesting. The market opportunity had potential. The features were right for the early stage.
But none of that mattered because they faced the challenge that kills more businesses than bad products ever do: the cold start problem.
Here’s what this project revealed about launching platforms and why most founders focus on the wrong things.
The Problem Most Founders Ignore
Building the best product means nothing if nobody uses it.
This is especially brutal for platforms and marketplaces.
The research platform faced a classic chicken-and-egg problem: researchers wouldn’t join without an active community of peers and potential funders. Investors wouldn’t pay for access without a robust network of researchers to connect with. Nobody moves first because everyone’s waiting for critical mass that doesn’t exist yet.
Most founders think the answer is “build better features.” But features don’t solve adoption problems. Strategy does.
Challenge #1: User Adoption When Nobody Knows You Exist
The platform needed researchers to join and create content. But researchers were already using LinkedIn, ResearchGate, email, and Slack for collaboration.
The question wasn’t “Is this a better tool?” The question was “Why would anyone change their workflow for an empty platform?”
This is the adoption challenge every new product faces. You’re not just competing with existing solutions - you’re competing with inertia.
The platform’s approach was to create “verticals” - hyper-focused communities on specific research topics that didn’t exist anywhere else. Smart differentiation, but it didn’t solve the fundamental problem: who joins first?
The Go-to-Market Insight: Differentiation gives potential customers a reason to consider your product. It doesn’t create urgency to switch from what they’re already using. You need both.
Challenge #2: The Cold Start Death Spiral
Here’s the brutal reality of platform businesses: the product only works when enough people use it.
The platform was designed around community-driven content and collaboration. But at launch, there would be:
Empty communities with no discussions
No content to browse or discover
No peers to connect with
No reason for the second user to join after the first
This is the cold start problem in action. The value of the platform depended entirely on having an active user base, but you can’t get an active user base without demonstrating value first.
Most platforms try to solve this by:
Offering incentives for early adopters (which attracts the wrong users)
Pre-populating content manually (which doesn’t scale and feels artificial)
Launching with a big marketing push (which brings users who immediately churn when they find an empty platform)
None of these solve the fundamental problem: you need users to create value for other users.
The Go-to-Market Insight: You can’t scale until you solve cold start. And you can’t solve cold start by scaling.
Challenge #3: The Monetization Timing Trap
The business model relied on free access for researchers and paid access for investors and corporate clients.
But this created a chicken-and-egg problem:
Can’t charge clients until there’s a robust research community
Can’t build a research community without resources to acquire and retain users
Can’t get resources without revenue
Can’t get revenue without users
The platform needed significant runway to reach the critical mass where monetization became viable. Most startups run out of money before reaching this point.
The Go-to-Market Insight: Your business model needs to generate revenue before you reach critical mass, or you need enough capital to survive until you do. Most founders underestimate both the time and money required.
Challenge #4: Building Before Validating
The platform was in active development with sophisticated features:
AI-powered matching algorithms
Eight content categories per vertical
Advanced search functionality
Integration with external databases
But here’s the problem: they were building features before proving anyone wanted the core product.
When I reviewed the strategy, the critical weakness was clear - they hadn’t validated product-market fit. They had assumptions about what researchers needed, but no evidence that researchers would actually use the platform to solve those needs.
External feedback confirmed this: focus on “validating the underlying concept and fit with target users” rather than expanding features or scaling go-to-market efforts.
The Go-to-Market Insight: Building the product is the easy part. Proving people want it is hard. Most founders reverse this priority.
Challenge #5: The Partnership Dependency Risk
The entire strategy relied on securing partnerships with:
Top research universities
Leading VC firms
Corporate R&D departments
These partnerships were supposed to provide credibility, users, and revenue simultaneously.
But this created massive execution risk. Every partnership negotiation takes months. Every delay compounds. And if key partnerships fall through, the entire strategy needs rebuilding.
The platform operated under a “gating principle” - don’t build more features until securing validation from target partners through beta tests.
Smart in theory. But in practice, it meant the business was perpetually one failed partnership away from needing to pivot.
The Go-to-Market Insight: Strategies that depend on securing multiple high-value partnerships before revenue generation are high-risk. You need paths to early revenue that don’t require perfect partnership execution.
Challenge #6: Serving Two Different Customers
The platform had two distinct user types with opposing needs:
Researchers: Want open collaboration, free access, and protection of their intellectual property.
Clients: Want exclusive access, proprietary insights, and competitive advantages.
Optimizing for one group meant compromising the other. Most platforms choose a primary customer and accept that the secondary customer gets a mediocre experience.
But this platform’s business model required satisfying both groups equally. Researchers wouldn’t join if the platform felt like it was selling their ideas. Clients wouldn’t pay without getting advantages over public information.
The Go-to-Market Insight: When your business model requires serving two customers with conflicting needs, you need to design value propositions that give both groups what they want without one feeling exploited.
What Actually Works: The Three-Priority Framework
After analyzing these challenges, the strategic recommendations focused on three priorities:
1. Solve Cold Start With a Wedge Strategy
Instead of launching broadly, identify one specific niche where you can achieve critical mass quickly. For this platform, that meant:
Pick 3-5 high-value verticals with existing demand
Manually recruit 20-30 active researchers per vertical
Create enough baseline content and activity to demonstrate value
Use these successful verticals as proof of concept for expansion
2. Validate Before Scaling
Run targeted beta tests with small groups measuring real engagement:
Are researchers actively creating content?
Are they returning weekly without prompting?
Are they inviting peers to join?
Are clients willing to pay for access?
If you can’t get 50 users deeply engaged, you won’t get 5,000. Fix engagement at small scale before attempting growth.
3. Create Early Revenue Without Scale
Find ways to generate revenue before reaching full critical mass:
Consulting services using platform data
Sponsored pilot programs with corporate clients
Premium features for power users
Strategic partnership deals that provide upfront payment
This creates runway to solve the cold start problem without burning through capital.
The Broader Lesson for Any Launch
The challenges this platform faced apply to any business that requires network effects, marketplace dynamics, or community engagement.
Whether you’re building software, launching a marketplace, or creating a community-driven product, you face similar questions:
How do you get the first users when the product only works with many users?
How do you prove value before you have the scale that creates value?
How do you generate revenue before reaching critical mass?
Most founders focus on product features and assume “if we build it, they will come.” But go-to-market strategy determines whether anyone discovers your product in the first place.
The cold start problem isn’t solved with better technology. It’s solved with better strategy around:
Wedge markets where you can achieve density quickly
Manual effort to create initial value before automation
Proof of concept before scaling
Revenue generation before achieving full network effects
What cold start challenges are you facing in your launch?
Your Next Step: Validate Before You Scale
If you’re building a platform or marketplace, stop adding features and start proving your core hypothesis.
Pick one user segment that represents your ideal customer. Create the minimum experience necessary to test whether they’ll actually engage the way you think they will. Commit to measuring real usage, not vanity metrics, for 90 days.
• You don’t need to build for every use case before launching...
• You don’t need perfect technology before testing demand...
• You need to prove people will actually use what you’re building before you scale it...
The strategies in this post aren’t theory—they’re lessons from real platform challenges that required systematic problem-solving to overcome.
Here’s the reality: you could spend the next year building features nobody wants, hoping users will come once everything’s perfect. Or you could validate demand first, then build only what users actually need.
The choice is between building for an imaginary market or building for proven demand.
What’s the biggest challenge you’re facing in building your platform or product?
📌 PS - If you found this post helpful, would you please consider restacking it and sharing it with your audience?
This spreads the word and keeps me writing content that will help you transform ideas into revenue-ready launches.